Former Secretary of States Condoleezza Rice spoke at cfr.org (Council on Foreign Relations). and she referred to the North as: in transition, succession problems, provocation possible. She referred to China as: internal unemployment problems, 'trying to find its place in the International community' (which I do not think is the case). No reference to Japan.
A campaign, can mean a lot to constituents. In democratic nations, it meant to appeal to people to get involved, to place themselves in the new set of social frames. It can open their eyes to the issue and the circumstances in relation with outer world. The taboos and unspoken rules of the society will be eliminated, and in the process find a new world without the inhibition of the traditional hegemony that rules the nation. There is a difference between depicting China as a nation that strives to sell low quality products out of hard labor at cheap prices and as a nation where low wage workers are being deprived of human rights without proper Internet search engines.
She referred to Palestine-Israel problems; Palestine is a nation where the domestic economic growth of 9% which is not a terrorist state. What Israel sees as its enemy is Iran and not Palestine, she said. She said she believes in the progress in the Middle East. What is worrying is WMD and nukes of those states and terrorists and she said that is the difference between with Russia. She referred to new START treaty and about bipartisan agreement saying something about number and quality of the weapons.
She said, "sometimes, enough is enough" referring to "the world with Saddam Hussein still in 2010". She said, "sometimes you must make clear choices and hard decision" referring to former President Bush. She said, "they may be tough" referring to the democratization process in Iraq. I believe she has to know the reality of the lives of people outside the US to make that to happen.
A campaign, can mean a lot to constituents. In democratic nations, it meant to appeal to people to get involved, to place themselves in the new set of social frames. It can open their eyes to the issue and the circumstances in relation with outer world. The taboos and unspoken rules of the society will be eliminated, and in the process find a new world without the inhibition of the traditional hegemony that rules the nation. There is a difference between depicting China as a nation that strives to sell low quality products out of hard labor at cheap prices and as a nation where low wage workers are being deprived of human rights without proper Internet search engines.
She referred to Palestine-Israel problems; Palestine is a nation where the domestic economic growth of 9% which is not a terrorist state. What Israel sees as its enemy is Iran and not Palestine, she said. She said she believes in the progress in the Middle East. What is worrying is WMD and nukes of those states and terrorists and she said that is the difference between with Russia. She referred to new START treaty and about bipartisan agreement saying something about number and quality of the weapons.
She said, "sometimes, enough is enough" referring to "the world with Saddam Hussein still in 2010". She said, "sometimes you must make clear choices and hard decision" referring to former President Bush. She said, "they may be tough" referring to the democratization process in Iraq. I believe she has to know the reality of the lives of people outside the US to make that to happen.