The tones of the papers on the Greek crisis -- or the Euro crisis varies from 1. the leaders of EU succeeded in buying time until the next bailout (pessimistic investors), 2. France and Germany agreed to pay for the bailout money (optimistic investors), and 3. the EU succeeded to coerce to austerity measures to Greece (the union workers in Greece). The French President said, the EU won't hold if Euro does not.
The poorer the nation is, the more chances that you encounter with grammatical disorders. In the worst case, there is not any such things as a set of grammatical rules. After all, all language expressions are synthetic, human-made, and go along with the social rules. Greece. Turkey. Iran. In those nations, there are officially set rules but not being followed. They are in the process to decide which rules to be official. Indonesia. The Philippines. India. Those are nations that have the official language but not strictly followed. They tend to have lower literacy rates for understandable reasons. Kurds. Afghanistan. Somalia. Those states and nations do not have official rules for their languages. They are in the process to set which language is official. And they have the tendency to hide that they do not have the rules -- it seems to be something to do with their national prides. So the disorder goes: various and not set pronunciations -- multiple entries in the dictionary -- grammatical abnormalities -- the selection of languages.
In places where the literacy rate is more than 99% such as Japan and the European nations, the people know what how to write correctly. They can deviate but do so knowing that they are. Where the deviations are limited to pronunciations, the written forms could have the dominance and they thrive in terms of the number of publications, and the sophistication in the forms of expressions. Or vice versa. Where the selection of the official language is purely official, the wordings in the public media seemed to be limited and thus stopped short of gaining the supports from the wide audiences. In those places, there tend to be disputes between the groups of people who use different languages. Where the word entries in the dictionaries vary, the communications are not so frequent with each local group. They seem to be content within their groups but there are few chances in the development in the use of the language. Where there is no official language set, most often than not, its government is not functional. There are serious disputes between those groups of different languages. The use of languages is correlated to the social environments, and intertwined with the development of them.