Attacking the logical flaw of the opponents is one way that surely damage the credibility. The word hypocritic always has an impact on those whose actions may not result in the way that they have claimed. At times, their heart is not in what they are doing; typically, all is for the donation money or support for the next election.
Former President Obama has been criticized for many of his policies. He has sold weapons regardless of the reputation of the buyers. He did not end the war in Afghanistan. Or rather, he made it worse. Obamacare has not covered everyone of us; rather, the rigid regulation helped insurance companies.
President Trump is the one that accused his moral discrepancy that goes despite his reputation. The people applauded his direct and honest talk that at times goes outside what we term as the political correctness. Not only in words. His threats against the international organizations and treaties have shaken the world. Is it not the US is 'leading the world'? Are we losing the war against dictatorship and oppression?
Not only President Trump refuted the policies of his predecessor, he has taken steps that makes it clearer. That is, he has taken steps further than his predecessor in what has been criticized as moral discrepancy. He has sold more weapons; he has sent troops. He nullified the rigid restrictions of Obamacare, creating controversies the new 'freedom' would help those companies.
Now the Trump Administration said on Thursday it is leaving UNESCO. Here is this; Obama stopped payment of its fees for the same reason Trump cited; the renowned international organization recognized the state of Palestine. The accumulated debt amounts something like $600 million. Should Trump be accused of what Obama started?
The organization is right in the middle of election the Director General. The US won't have a say in this process. Nor in any of the processes that UNESCO does. The allies of the US in the organization won't have the strongest backing of the US in any way. They will be fighting against for their sake against all the rest of them.
Is this wise? Is it making this nation great again? Below are the candidates of its chair. Let us be optimistic about the future of the organization and its role in the international community.
Former President Obama has been criticized for many of his policies. He has sold weapons regardless of the reputation of the buyers. He did not end the war in Afghanistan. Or rather, he made it worse. Obamacare has not covered everyone of us; rather, the rigid regulation helped insurance companies.
President Trump is the one that accused his moral discrepancy that goes despite his reputation. The people applauded his direct and honest talk that at times goes outside what we term as the political correctness. Not only in words. His threats against the international organizations and treaties have shaken the world. Is it not the US is 'leading the world'? Are we losing the war against dictatorship and oppression?
Not only President Trump refuted the policies of his predecessor, he has taken steps that makes it clearer. That is, he has taken steps further than his predecessor in what has been criticized as moral discrepancy. He has sold more weapons; he has sent troops. He nullified the rigid restrictions of Obamacare, creating controversies the new 'freedom' would help those companies.
Now the Trump Administration said on Thursday it is leaving UNESCO. Here is this; Obama stopped payment of its fees for the same reason Trump cited; the renowned international organization recognized the state of Palestine. The accumulated debt amounts something like $600 million. Should Trump be accused of what Obama started?
The organization is right in the middle of election the Director General. The US won't have a say in this process. Nor in any of the processes that UNESCO does. The allies of the US in the organization won't have the strongest backing of the US in any way. They will be fighting against for their sake against all the rest of them.
Is this wise? Is it making this nation great again? Below are the candidates of its chair. Let us be optimistic about the future of the organization and its role in the international community.
Fair-play and hand-shake with my competitor Audrey Azoulay. We may have different visions but serving UNESCO unites us. Thanks Audrey!! pic.twitter.com/bnXPNCfCO6
— Hamad Al-Kawari (@alkawari4unesco) October 11, 2017