Democratic Presidential candidates will debate on TV next week.
It would be anybody's guesses that the topic of conversation would be focused upon President Trump's comments on race. We'd be hearing the personal accusations against the President. Will the talk on immigration then? Could they land on some policies that can unite the party?
The low unemployment rates and the stock market may not garner the sympathies of esp. low wage workers for the fair treatment of immigrants. The support by the labor unions for the party may not help talking of humanity here.
Well maybe not (as I searched the news today).
The Congress passed the law against the Trump Administration selling Saudi the weapons. That vote was followed by the Administration selling Saudi billions of dollars of weapons. The Congress voted against the US participation in the civil wars in Yemen. Will the talk of the issue?
Would it be about environment? What of the environment? If not about science, how about spending? How about the Green New Deal?
In any case, I want the Administration rules over those discourages talking about politics. No, your ignorant colleague is not an excuse by the state abusing an individual writing things about politics. No, you do not hear what 'people' say. You hear what the state says (or some dictatorial powerful someone). Problem talking about Biden's age (76)? His 'metaphor' is disgusting. Stop. No, whatever in a question form does not hide the intention.
It would be anybody's guesses that the topic of conversation would be focused upon President Trump's comments on race. We'd be hearing the personal accusations against the President. Will the talk on immigration then? Could they land on some policies that can unite the party?
#IStandWithAlexandria #IStandWithAyanna#IStandWithRashida #IStandWithIlhan— WeAreBetterThanThis (@ResistXIIXVXIX) July 22, 2019
‘We don’t need new laws. We need morality.’ — Rep @RashidaTlaib pic.twitter.com/eL5TIvQRUN
The low unemployment rates and the stock market may not garner the sympathies of esp. low wage workers for the fair treatment of immigrants. The support by the labor unions for the party may not help talking of humanity here.
Well maybe not (as I searched the news today).
The Congress passed the law against the Trump Administration selling Saudi the weapons. That vote was followed by the Administration selling Saudi billions of dollars of weapons. The Congress voted against the US participation in the civil wars in Yemen. Will the talk of the issue?
Would it be about environment? What of the environment? If not about science, how about spending? How about the Green New Deal?
In any case, I want the Administration rules over those discourages talking about politics. No, your ignorant colleague is not an excuse by the state abusing an individual writing things about politics. No, you do not hear what 'people' say. You hear what the state says (or some dictatorial powerful someone). Problem talking about Biden's age (76)? His 'metaphor' is disgusting. Stop. No, whatever in a question form does not hide the intention.