Labeling

Labeling is a typical tactics in accusing the opponent. You'd label President Trump as racist. The stereotypes creates easy allies.

Labeling has some political importance. It is catchy and has life of its own. Without much thinking, the negative nuance prevails. The language is important, since if there is no such notion that discriminates dyslexia, then labeling is impossible. Therefore the political entities would look for effective labels. It is a type of scapegoating, targeting a group of people, yet more of word's play, such as 'racist' vs a 'race card'.

Labels, and labels. Some call it 'definition'. Is this mere word play for us, or for the politicians? If they claim they work for us, would they not go for the compromises that would help us the voters? The drug prices go down if we import them. Any compromise, or recognition, or better ideas? Or are they still under big pharma and their money?

The personal attacks against President Trump may be 'interesting' yet does not work for us.

PS: If they do not understand what basic compulsory education is, they should not be in charge of our educational system. No, logarithm is not some new spec of a programming language. The concept has been there for hundreds of years.

You mean bad in the head, right? Not being 'bad' in 'bad Sarko boys' nor 'bad boy Trump'.

No, your supposed new boss is not an excuse for harassment. No, not in a question form or just hinting at something.