Charging fees for learning a new concept, is by far, most ridiculous business model that no even any gang member would not come up with. "I show you the way for a fee" etc.
This is a matter of copyright. Or simple teacher's dilemma. The instructors do not 'own' the concept. It is abuse of power, or academic harassment.
Who owns the copyright of the pages? Not Google for sure, as pointed out properly as the basis for taxation, which they do not despite their support of all the social causes online. They accuse Google for taking advantages of pages written by unpaid authors. Then we should accuse the academics that takes the advantages of unpaid authors selling the materials on their terms.
Likewise, if you'd need some political help for getting the government help, that is abuse of power. The particular politician does not own the government money. Or should not, that is. It should not even be their money especially with our huge national debt.
If they claim 'the buck stops here' then they indeed should be credited by the responsibility of balancing the budget. No, it does not mean forcing a particular citizen go for shopping and claim they encouraged businesses. What? No, my opinion written in this blog is not 'harassment'. Define 'harassment' in your own words. If voters express their political opinion, it is not 'harassment' against the leaders. The 'harassment' is a crime because it is abuse of power. What of the media vs the President case, is it the 'presidential harassment'? That depends on who you think has the power.
The author should own the copyright of the work. Not the mediator, not the politicians, not the government, nor the state.
This is a matter of copyright. Or simple teacher's dilemma. The instructors do not 'own' the concept. It is abuse of power, or academic harassment.
Who owns the copyright of the pages? Not Google for sure, as pointed out properly as the basis for taxation, which they do not despite their support of all the social causes online. They accuse Google for taking advantages of pages written by unpaid authors. Then we should accuse the academics that takes the advantages of unpaid authors selling the materials on their terms.
Likewise, if you'd need some political help for getting the government help, that is abuse of power. The particular politician does not own the government money. Or should not, that is. It should not even be their money especially with our huge national debt.
If they claim 'the buck stops here' then they indeed should be credited by the responsibility of balancing the budget. No, it does not mean forcing a particular citizen go for shopping and claim they encouraged businesses. What? No, my opinion written in this blog is not 'harassment'. Define 'harassment' in your own words. If voters express their political opinion, it is not 'harassment' against the leaders. The 'harassment' is a crime because it is abuse of power. What of the media vs the President case, is it the 'presidential harassment'? That depends on who you think has the power.
The author should own the copyright of the work. Not the mediator, not the politicians, not the government, nor the state.