What is more hateful than the spoiled son of the rich? And yet, only the fools saying it loud in public; it is unfair. The 'guests' in prestigious private schools ruin the reputations of the school's teaching. Sometimes they do get expelled (Obama daughter?); they do not catch up with the rest of them from poorer background. Former President Bush is known for not even reading books; he just can ask around and get the answer for his questions.
Here comes the questions of political correctness. President Trump campaigned on ignoring the social implications of political correctness; here it says what it is; social implications of political correctness. It is not about political implications; it is social implications. What is the social implications of political correctness on autism? Mind you, any autism son can be a baron if his family carries the title.
Nothing is more daunting than working hours of study and reading the news talking of the very rich and powerful protected for 'paying up'; did you spend how much today? Should that matter? Could it matter? What freedom is he talking about? His romanticism about capitalism is not 'mandatory'. We should be protected always without paying up for the system; and money is not speech. The physiological implication of money spending if not being poisoned should be minimum in all scientific theories. Psychology? Of being dominated by the scheme that only benefits the rich?
If you make the system work for the rich, 'paying up for the day' should matter the most, a whole lot more than your achievement in your activities, be it athletic or academic. Reading a literature is a lot more important than encountering with some weird looking senior with protruding bellies. Understanding a full statement of the ancient scholar is means far more than the vein of the former colleague. Getting the result of solving a formula and finding not an idiot with disgusting design but the rules of the universe weighs more in my life than enjoyable conversation with the powerful someone or the ones with such backing. And yes, race should not be an issue. I do not always have conversation with my fellow countrymen at breakfast table.
It would be interesting if President Trump thinks against his own campaign on PC. BTW I am all for PC on the basis that would ruin the individual otherwise. Which in this case I'd assume it would not.
Here comes the questions of political correctness. President Trump campaigned on ignoring the social implications of political correctness; here it says what it is; social implications of political correctness. It is not about political implications; it is social implications. What is the social implications of political correctness on autism? Mind you, any autism son can be a baron if his family carries the title.
Nothing is more daunting than working hours of study and reading the news talking of the very rich and powerful protected for 'paying up'; did you spend how much today? Should that matter? Could it matter? What freedom is he talking about? His romanticism about capitalism is not 'mandatory'. We should be protected always without paying up for the system; and money is not speech. The physiological implication of money spending if not being poisoned should be minimum in all scientific theories. Psychology? Of being dominated by the scheme that only benefits the rich?
If you make the system work for the rich, 'paying up for the day' should matter the most, a whole lot more than your achievement in your activities, be it athletic or academic. Reading a literature is a lot more important than encountering with some weird looking senior with protruding bellies. Understanding a full statement of the ancient scholar is means far more than the vein of the former colleague. Getting the result of solving a formula and finding not an idiot with disgusting design but the rules of the universe weighs more in my life than enjoyable conversation with the powerful someone or the ones with such backing. And yes, race should not be an issue. I do not always have conversation with my fellow countrymen at breakfast table.
It would be interesting if President Trump thinks against his own campaign on PC. BTW I am all for PC on the basis that would ruin the individual otherwise. Which in this case I'd assume it would not.