Nothing is more effective than attacking the member using the same argument within the group. You talk in their language.
Supposing, say, you'd want accusation against a Democrat. Typically, Republicans would use the same argument within. How effective is it if you accuse your opponent saying the same thing as your own family member?
"Behave like an adult (in some fatherly fashion)"
"Blame yourself (in some friendly manner)"
"I manage your finance (in some finance adviser style)"
Here is this, however. They do not speak for you. They speak for themselves, by imitating your community member. Clever (albeit melodramatic) tactics! You'd know them and you'd be controlling them thus. I do not identify in the "Harvard" "French" "foolish Activist" way because of this reason. Nothing is more annoying than disturbed of your political conversation by some pseudo-family/friend advice.
If your enemy find out about you, they will attack you based upon that info. Your info must be protected. Or you get out of the group, be it a party, a community, or a company.
In politics, the ridiculous suggestion of a pseudo-family/friend goes political. As if speaking for the party, or the nation, claiming:
"The race is becoming racially prejudiced"
"CNN is biased against Sanders"
"CNN stifled the discussion on climate"
The last DemDebate before the early primary starts and ends with some endorsement on President Trump's policies. The following discussion further strengthens his arguments. The candidates and their policies do not collide with the President.
Supposing, say, you'd want accusation against a Democrat. Typically, Republicans would use the same argument within. How effective is it if you accuse your opponent saying the same thing as your own family member?
"Behave like an adult (in some fatherly fashion)"
"Blame yourself (in some friendly manner)"
"I manage your finance (in some finance adviser style)"
Here is this, however. They do not speak for you. They speak for themselves, by imitating your community member. Clever (albeit melodramatic) tactics! You'd know them and you'd be controlling them thus. I do not identify in the "Harvard" "French" "foolish Activist" way because of this reason. Nothing is more annoying than disturbed of your political conversation by some pseudo-family/friend advice.
If your enemy find out about you, they will attack you based upon that info. Your info must be protected. Or you get out of the group, be it a party, a community, or a company.
In politics, the ridiculous suggestion of a pseudo-family/friend goes political. As if speaking for the party, or the nation, claiming:
"The race is becoming racially prejudiced"
"CNN is biased against Sanders"
"CNN stifled the discussion on climate"
The last DemDebate before the early primary starts and ends with some endorsement on President Trump's policies. The following discussion further strengthens his arguments. The candidates and their policies do not collide with the President.